Home / Politics / The Dangers of the Pan-sexual Agenda Part 1: What is Pan-sexuality

The Dangers of the Pan-sexual Agenda Part 1: What is Pan-sexuality

Often called the homosexual agenda, it is in truth a pan-sexual agenda that is happening. Pan-sexuality is defined by the LGBT community as quote:

“Pansexual is a term that has been growing in recent years as a way for people to better identify their sexual identity. The word Pansexual is derived from the Greek prefix pan, meaning “all”. The term is reflective of those who feel they are sexually/emotionally/spiritually capable of falling in love with all genders. [1]

Definition: Pansexuals have the capability of attraction to others regardless of their gender identity or biological sex. A pansexual could be open to someone who is male, female, transgender, intersex, or agendered/genderqueer.”

In other words pansexuality is an anything goes, nothing is off limits type of sexuality. Men, women, children, old, young, animals, nothing is taboo, everything is permitted. It is into this sort of organized, activist driven perversion that we are sending our children when they go to school. They are not safe and the danger is getting worse every day. We no longer look out for their best interests, instead we give them money, video games, the internet to keep them occupied. And when that is not enough, we give them drugs to silence them and make them more docile. We have become a society that systematically abuses children and we call it progress. The abuse is emotional, physical and sexual.

Children are being made obese through sitting around eating junk and playing on computers. They are neglected by not having values and virtues instilled in them, so they seek out attachments in the form of texting and video games. And the sexual abuse, that is the worst part of the abuse we do to our children, and what’s more, many of us actually champion this abuse.

The evil we have given into is dragging us into a darkness few have the courage to look into. That darkness is a nightmare full of screaming children as they are sexually defiled and abused, pimped out and put on display like pieces of meat.

Currently the child exploitation industry, which includes child pornography and sex slavery/human trafficking is a multibillion dollar a year industry, and despite it being illegal, it continues to grow in size and profitability. And it is scheduled for a massive surge in both business as well as a public relations makeover.

The Left, and their sick ideas are growing all across the Western World and typically what happens in one area will happen in other areas as well–same sex marriage being one example. Currently in the province of Ontario, in Canada, the Liberal Party run government, under the openly lesbian Premier Kathleen Wynne, is implementing the most depraved sex education curriculum ever devised, which has been conceived of by convicted pedophile Ben Levin. Ben Levin was the “esteemed educator”, tenured University of Toronto professor and former Ontario deputy education minister who liked to frequent an online incest chat room to counsel single moms on how to sexually assault their daughters for his pleasure and theirs, a site where his profile listed his sexuality as “nothing is taboo” and who pled guilty to creating child pornography, possessing child porn and counselling to commit a sexual assault.

Levin on June 24, 2009, wrote that:

“Realizing the Promise of Diversity: Ontario’s Equity and Inclusive Education Strategy” sets out a “vision for an equitable and inclusive education system.” He wrote “the principles of equity and inclusive education should be embedded into all aspects of board and high school operations including program, employment, research, curriculum, resources, instructional and assessment practices.”[2]

What could a degenerate whose sexuality is self-described as “nothing is taboo” mean by this?

In part 2 I will go  into the depraved indoctrination and sexual grooming Canadian children will be put through.

 

[1] http://www.stop-homophobia.com/pansexuality.htm

[2] http://www.torontosun.com/2015/03/02/liberals-cant-deny-levins-role-with-sex-ed-curriculum

About Jonathan Kotyk

Jonathan Kotyk is a student, self taught philosopher, recovering addict and born again Christian. He has spent time on both the far Left and Far Right side of the political spectrum and lives in Canada.

Check Also

Shadows of Jesus in the Old Testament

After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here ...

33 comments

  1. This is not true. Pansexuals are not attracted to anything other that humans, we are attracted to all types of humans including female, male, trans, ans any other gender. Also, we are not dangerous at all. As a “child” (12 years old) I know what it’s like in school. Parents don’t need to protect us from the nonexistant dangers of pansexuality. We are just humans. By the way, I am Christian, too, so don’t assume I am prejudiced because of your religion.

    • Pan means “all” so pan-sexuals are sexually attracted towards children, adults, seniors, male, female, they are into every sexual fetish from BDSM to bestiality. It is the sexual identity being pushed on us by cultural Marxists.
      Yes parents need to protect their children form pan-sexuals since they are just as dangerous to children as pedophiles, perhaps even more so considering their political agenda.

      • The thought of anyone abusing children or animals disgusts me, and I’m pansexual. Pansexuality is about loving CONSENTING ADULTS, and preaching hate will get you no where in life. Write your pretty little bios and throw in larger words to make yourself feel important but anyone with a clear mind and heart will see that the hate your spreading is hypocritical when you call yourself a born again Christian. God rejects hate. Remember that.

      • All meaning all genders. Not all things in life. Ignorance is bliss though.

    • Michelle Walker

      Actually this is the full defined meaning and Alton Brown the serial killer was diagnosed that in prison. That is what the Psychiatrist said

    • So, what is your concept and definition of a Christian? The word means different things to different people.

    • Hi, I’m a young, pan, teen, and nearly screamed when I saw this article. It is absolutely appalling that you say such blatant lies like they are truth. I am disgusted.
      Pansexuality is not dangerous, wrong, or unnatural, as many, misinformed, people seem to believe. It is simply looking who you love, and excepting yourself for who you are. If you believe that it is a new or unnatural thing, just look at Greek, Roman, Celtic, etc Mythology and history, and you’ll find that it’s not quite as new as you think.
      It is articles like this, which spread so much LGBTQ+ hate.

    • Dude if you just look up pansexual you will see that we do not support zoophilia and pedophilia. No one in the lgbtq+ community does.

  2. Again “pan” means “all”, sexual is self-explanatory. Being all sexual means you are into all sexual fetishes, that includes pedophilia and bestiality, that is what the agenda is about, making society OK with anything and everything.
    The truth is never hateful, only people who believe in lies say that.

    • Actually when is talking about the word pan which is translated to all it’s actually talking about genders. Pansexuals are people who like all genders. The sexual part is talking about what gender/gender identity they find sexually attracting. If your Panromantic that means you find all gender emotionally attracting. It does in no way mean fetishes and pedophilia and zoophilia like any other place is looked down upon in the community. I can see how you made this mistake but as a pansexual person I hope that you now know that everyone in the lgbtq+ community despises pedophiles and zoophilia, and what the part in the name of sexual does not mean fetishs.

    • In your own definition that ypu copied and pasted for your article “Pansexual is a term that has been growing in recent years as a way for people to better identify their sexual identity. The word Pansexual is derived from the Greek prefix pan, meaning “all”. The term is reflective of those who feel they are sexually/emotionally/spiritually capable of falling in love with all genders. [1]

      Definition: Pansexuals have the capability of attraction to others regardless of their gender identity or biological sex. A pansexual could be open to someone who is male, female, transgender, intersex, or agendered/genderqueer.”

      It literally gives you the correct definition where it says Pansexuals are attracted to all GENDERS regardless of GENDERS. A sexual orientation ( Like heterosexual for example) is about genders not children because children is not a gender. That would be like saying the prefix hetero means other so heterosexuality means liking thinks other than humans. Is that true? No, because it involves a persons gender. So how in the world did you get the correct definition of pan and yet still stretch the meaning of pansexual this far.

  3. Kotyk get a life man. All, but you nigga. Lonely ass loser. You don’t get to decide WhT anything means to anyone else. I’m attracted to ALL genders. Not animals. Not kids. You sick fuck. Fuck you.

    • There are only 2 genders idiot. Label yourself bi then Pan comes from the Greek word meaning all and from the Greek god pan. Clearly people get off on giving themselves”in” buzzwords with little understanding of what you’re actually talking about

      • Yes while there may be only two binary genders there are a lot of gender identities and non binary genders. Bi means being attracted to more than one gender but can be attracted to all. Pan is being attracted to all genders regardless of their gender.

        So now when I said gender in those short definitions that means gender identity’s and non binary genders as well. Pan does not mean bi and bi does not mean pan. Saying that there is only two genders is rather transphobic and false. There is two BINARY genders but not just two genders.

    • Hey Rich, you are more than welcome to express your disagreement, but you need to clean up your talk!

  4. Pan has nothing to do with beastility or pedophilia it’s consenting adults

  5. Faithful And Wise Steward

    You have Pedophiles with pizza slice avatars misrepresenting their true intentions.

    • If you want to see an actual pedophile instead of making the claim that pansexuals are pedophiles, I would suggest looking up the term MAP. This stands for Minor Attracted Person, or better known as a pedophile. These are the people who are trying to normalize pedophilia not the lgbtq+ community themselves. It was started by trolls giving them their own flags and has now developed into a problem that the lgbtq+ community still struggles to stop to this day. I am telling you this so you can be aware of to actually hide your children from and so you can redirect your claims of pedophilia to a group that actually supports it. And for our intentions all I want is respect, people knowing that I’m not a pedophile ( which I thought would be a given), and to eat some sushi. So please fight against an actual group supporting pedophilia, and please stop attacking the group which tries to stop pedophilia just like you.

  6. As someone who identifies as pansexual I can tell you that your very wrong about our community.
    Yes pan means all, but it’s more than just the literal translation. Being pansexual means you are attracted to all genders without a particular preference towards any certain gender. Children are not genders, animals are not genders, and fetishes are not genders. When we say all genders we have the context that biological sex and gender are different. I likely won’t be able to convince you to take the stance that they’re two different things yourself, but not using this context when talking about this definition is misunderstanding and misrepresenting the pansexual community. And once again we are talking about consenting ADULT HUMANS! Your sexual orientation does not make you more or less likely to be a pedofile or into bestiality. As for your argument, (assuming your straight) what if I said: Heterosexual, het means opposite so all Heterosexual women are have sex with little boys, old men, and make animals and all Heterosexual men have sex with little girls, old ladies, and female animals. After all, it doesn’t say anything about humans or age in the definition.
    That would be pretty ridiculous because obviously we both know that’s not true, and it’s not true what your saying about pansexuals either. If your offended by someone making these kinds of claims about straight people, then you can imagine what reading your article as a pansexual person is like. I do not want to have sex with kids, seniors, or animals and I’m not into every single fetish. If you don’t believe me then you must love having sex with little girls and female animals because if you can’t believe me than why would I believe you if you denied that claim. There’s no agenda or conspiracy. A group of people just found a lable that best describes their sexual orientation, just like heterosexual describes yours. If your so concerned about children’s safety why don’t your make an article on MAPs (minor attracted person(s)) instead, if you don’t know about them look them up: those guys actually are pedophiles not pansexuals.

  7. whoever wrote this was high af lmaoooo thats not what pansexuality is

    • I am the admin for this site and I just wanted to give a brief response to address your statement and what I’ve noticed others saying as well. I think people have various ideas of what it means to be pansexual. I know many see it specifically relating to humans, and I’ve known others who’ve had the “whatever feels good to them at the moment.” As a website, our stance isn’t to be critical of you if that’s your choice, but we also encourage our writer’s to express their voice as they feel led to do so. I think it’s similar to being vegetarian. Some people eat things like eggs and fish, and others will swear up and down you’re not a vegetarian if you don’t eat strictly celery, carrots and the like. Regardless, you are certainly welcome on this site and encouraged to share your voice even if it is in disagreement as you have done. God bless. 🙂

      • I do respect your opinion and I do believe that everyone should have a voice. However what people have problems with if the author had just done a quick google search ( which any author should do anyways if they want to tell facts) he would have found that it actually means “The prefix “pan-” means “all.” Similarly, pansexuality means that you’re attracted to people of all genders. This includes people who don’t identify with any gender (agender). Many pansexual people describe themselves as being attracted to people based on personality, not gender.( this was copied and pasted)Sep 17, 2019”. This in no way includes pedophilia and zoophilia. The way it looks as the author wanted to hurt the lgbtqia+ community even more by spreading false rumors about them. The flag colors stand for women, non binary, and men not minors, animals, and lies! It’s things like this that hurt the LGBTQ+ community just because one person didn’t do their research.

        • First and foremost, thank you for sharing your thoughts as it gives us all something to consider. I’m not going to claim to be an expert on what it means to be “pansexual” and I think the Internet can oftentimes be a place of misinformation with all that gets shared. You can also have a term, such as the one being discussed, and one group of people may define it differently than another. Just know you are definitely welcome on here and your sharing is appreciated. Even if there is disagreement, I’m sure there are many other things we can agree on. This is also how we learn. We share, and allow others to share so we can piece it all together so it makes more sense to people like me have a limited understanding of a subject. Wishing you a Blessed New Year. 🙂

          • Thank you and I do agree that the internet can be a place of misunderstanding. My problem is just the lack of research that was done and how this hurts my community. I just don’t understand how the author came to this conclusion. I do wish you a good year though.

  8. I feel disgusted by the author of this article, and I hate the fact that they can say such lies so confidently. We have done nothing but love and accept who we are, and your just using us as a target for your homophobia. In other words, the person who wrote this is a little bitch whom I sincerely hope dies alone with no one n the world who cares about him/her/them. We just want to have a good life, and it’s disgusting people like this that put even that at stake. Please, to anyone who reads this, don’t believe them.

    • Sometimes it takes a bit of discussion to sort out what something is or isn’t or even to identify people who adhere to certain lifestyle choices so that things can be discussed constructively. I also certainly appreciate you taking the time to share about how you feel about this subject. I can’t speak directly for the author, but I’m thankful we were able to see another side to this from you sharing. So thanks. 🙂

    • All these comments fail to understand my argument, I am speaking of a worldview in which there is no internal check or limit as to what is acceptable sexual morals. The LGBT movement has no such internal restraints. There is no set, or ultimate standard that says this certain behavior is okay, this behavior is not.

      Perhaps, people should read the entire article, this is just part 1 of a 3 part series.
      https://www.tblfaithnews.com/politics/the-dangers-of-the-pan-sexual-agenda-part-2-education-or-grooming
      https://www.tblfaithnews.com/politics/the-dangers-of-the-pan-sexual-agenda-part-3-the-end-game

      • Pardon me, but are you a part of the LGBTQ+ community? No? So then you aren’t Pansexual? Well then dear we may have a problem because if you aren’t on then you don’t really have a say in what it is. Speak from experience, not rumor.

        • Thanks for sharing your perspective. I’m actually glad we’ve been able to hear from people who are a part of that specific community so we are able to gain some additional insight. Personally I’ve heard various definitions for “pansexual”, and I can understand how applying an unwanted definition could seem hurtful. Hopefully even when there is disagreement, we can learn from each other and you are certainly welcome to be a part of our group as well. It always helps to hear from people who see the world through somewhat different lenses than how we may see things. Wishing you many blessings. 🙂

      • The definition of Pansexual as you have said is the attraction to all GENDERS regardless of gender. Where does this say the attraction to kids?

        You support conversion therapy which often leads to mental health issues and suicide, that tenth graders shouldn’t learn how to use condoms to prevent sexual diseases and pregnancy in the future for when they do have sex, that sex Ed and the education about abusive relationship shouldn’t be taught because it harms children. Not knowing of it is what causes people to think it’s normal, teaching the dangers of it helps them prevent or get out of those situations. you don’t support two guys holding hands so it’s obvious you don’t like any sexual orientation besides your own, and that they shouldn’t have any rights.

        Take a step back and just reflect on how you say anything is being a pedophille just because you don’t t agree with it. Stop stretching meanings because by the mental laps you are doing heterosexual might as well mean that attraction to anything other than human, as the prefix hetero means other.

  9. Hey, you know who has had the MOST trouble being pedophiles? Straight, white, Christian men. The call is coming from INSIDE the house. Exterminate the roaches in your own home before you come into mine.

    Self righteous pig of a man.
    This rag of bigotry, ignorance, and falsehoods should be removed.

    • Thanks for sharing your view. My stance on any of it is it’s not about calling groups out, but rather individuals. If someone is a “pedophile” then it’s on them not any groups they are a part of unless that group demands a specific behavior. As a Christian, I don’t believe it means we are exempt from ever doing anything wrong. If you have a billion Christians, there’s going to be a good number committing sins, crimes, or whatever you would like to label it all as. I would even go as far as to say that there are Christians who identify as “pansexual.” Personally, I believe I’m responsible for my own choices in life, whether they are good or bad. Additionally, I have no negative feelings towards anybody who identifies as being “pansexual” and I think there’s a lot to still be learned as to what that means, so I appreciate everybody sharing. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *